From: Admin Mailing Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mlist> no, there's no version rule per say. but AFAIA the vast mlist> majority of the online society has adopted that a is alpha, b mlist> is beta, and g is gamma, all meaning a pre-release to the mlist> version number stated. And what does 'c' mean then? I just glanced at www.freshmeat.net, and in the right column, I could find at least three distributions having a version number ending with a 'c'. I found one package that obviously uses 'a' to mean "alpha", so I'm not saying you're wrong, just that both worlds exist, and that the only way to know is to look more closely at the package and use your gray cells. mlist> so i have to download a version first, then read that include mlist> file to see if i have the latest version? There are more ways to check that out, for example take a look at http://www.openssl.org/news/, where events are given in inversed chronoligical order. You'll notice that 0.9.6 came half a year ago, which should mean that 0.9.6a can hardly be an alpha of the same version. mlist> which makes it even more unclear to people who take 'a' as mlist> meaning alpha (a beta 3 to an alpha? huh?) Oh, come on, that was ridiculous... mlist> it's true you're welcome to do versioning anyway you want..but mlist> noone i know has ever taken 'a' as a newer release on the same mlist> version. Now you know one: me. :-) And I can give you another one: RMS (emacs 19.34 was followed by 19.34a which was followed by 19.34b) -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 3 released
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Tue, 03 Apr 2001 00:00:08 -0700
- RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 3 rel... lgazis
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... Lutz Jaenicke
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... David Rees
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... Admin Mailing Lists
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... Paul Allen
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... Doug Kaufman
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... Jean-Marc Desperrier
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker