>From the overwhelming lack of response I guess no one on this list cares about Motorola 68k implementations. Just a final note in case anyone is listening. The previous file I sent works fine, passes all the tests. I noticed that my use of roxl/roxr in the bn_add_words and bn_sub_words functions was a poor choice, so this version avoids those instructions.
-- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Zidlicky > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [MiNT] M68020 bn_asm > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:43:56AM -0800, Howard Chu wrote: > > Here is a more thorough assembly implementation of bn_asm for > Motorola 680x0 > > processors. On a 68030 the RSA/DSA test is over 4x faster than > gcc -O3 code. > > I am releasing this version under the terms of the OpenSSL license. > > thanks, I will test it on linux-m68k as soon as my CPU will have > a few spare cycles. > > One thing I have noted, you use the 64 bit variants of mul/div in > many places. This will probbaly make the code much slower than gcc > generated code on 68060 CPUs as they do not implemente this insns > in hardware and need to emulate them in the OS. > > Bye > Richard >
bn_m68k.s
Description: Binary data
