Bodo Moeller wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 11:16:23AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > > I see no problem adding this patch. Queued. > > The problem is that the application callback prototype is incompatibly > changed. Otherwise I would have added the argument instead of simply > adding comments pointing out the inconsistency. To maintain backwards > compatibilty, it looks like we need a new function for registering > callback functions expecting this additional argument. >
If its likely to be a problem then I suggest we don't bother with this patch at all. Its not needed because its possible to access application specific data in the verify callback via the relevant SSL structure as I indicated in another message. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/ Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior crypto engineer, Gemplus: http://www.gemplus.com/ Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/ Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
