In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 05 Jun 2002 10:10:52 -0400, Rich
Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rsalz> > rsalz> */* ) echo "$I" | sed -e 's@\(.*\)/.*@\1@' ;;
rsalz> >
rsalz> > Why such a complicated sed? 's@/[^/]*$@@' is perfecty sufficient, and
rsalz> > a little bit more efficient :-).
rsalz>
rsalz> Because it makes the implementation of "basename" pretty
rsalz> obvious :)
sed -e 's|^[^/]*/||g'
rsalz> As for efficiency :) here's an implementation that uses all
rsalz> shell builtins ...
Heh, we can probably battle endlessly about efficiency. That was a
pretty good one, and a bit less obscure than the expr variant shown
here.
:-)
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
