In revision 1.81 of Configure, the automatic run of 'make depend' was
commented out. IIRC, this was done because we had a dependency
rebuild war happening a little now and then back then. Since then,
we've unified the results of dependency generation with the domd
script, so this kind of war doesn't really happen any more that I know
of.
Doug Kaufman very correctly points out that it's not documented that
configuration with some algorithms removed requires a manual 'make
depend', and that a robust configuration system would do that for
you.
So, I'd like to ask everyone (except for Doug, I know your opinion
already ;-)): should we uncomment the call to 'make depend'?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
