On December 8, 2002 04:35 am, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 8 Dec > 2002 10:31:46 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > levitte> Log: > levitte> Since it's defined in draft-ietf-tls-compression-04.txt, > let's make levitte> ZLIB a known compression method, with the > identity 1. > > Quite honestly, I'm wondering if I should move this to 0.9.7-stable...
Hmm ... I'd say that was probably not a wise idea given how long 0.9.7 has been in beta already. Building of zlib/compression support is potentially a "platform"-volatile issue that has never been an issue before (if zlib wasn't built-in, who cared?). I think it'd make more sense to cut down on features going into the HEAD after 0.9.7 is out so that 0.9.8 could be released sooner rather than later (0.9.7 has been a long time coming, I don't think 0.9.8 should be such a big gap). Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ The bastards have beaten off rationalism for now, but haven't eliminated our capacity for reason - to do that they'd have to make us forget how to both think and fear at the same time. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
