In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 24 Jan 2003
23:27:00 +0100 (CET), "Bodo Moeller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
bodo> patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
bodo> Index: openssl/CHANGES
bodo> ============================================================================
bodo> $ cvs diff -u -r1.977.2.90 -r1.977.2.91 CHANGES
bodo> --- openssl/CHANGES 24 Jan 2003 00:42:47 -0000 1.977.2.90
bodo> +++ openssl/CHANGES 24 Jan 2003 22:26:58 -0000 1.977.2.91
bodo> @@ -1707,6 +1707,11 @@
bodo> be reduced modulo m.
bodo> [Lenka Fibikova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bodo Moeller]
bodo>
bodo> +#if 0
bodo> + The following entry accidentily appeared in the CHANGES file
bodo> + distributed with OpenSSL 0.9.7. The modifications described in
bodo> + it do *not* apply to OpenSSL 0.9.7.
bodo> +
bodo> *) Remove a few calls to bn_wexpand() in BN_sqr() (the one in there
bodo> was actually never needed) and in BN_mul(). The removal in BN_mul()
bodo> required a small change in bn_mul_part_recursive() and the addition
bodo> @@ -1715,6 +1720,7 @@
bodo> bn_sub_words() and bn_add_words() except they take arrays with
bodo> differing sizes.
bodo> [Richard Levitte]
bodo> +#endif
bodo>
bodo> *) In 'openssl passwd', verify passwords read from the terminal
bodo> unless the '-salt' option is used (which usually means that
bodo> @@ .
?????
I did that a really long time ago, IIRC. Are you sure?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
