In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:00:15 -0600, "Gary Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
garwal> I have been working on porting OpenSSL to the THEOS Operating garwal> System. The C compiler is ANSI C compliant and "mostly" ISO garwal> C99 compliant. However, it is not as feature rich as GCC. My garwal> main problem is with the function pointer callbacks that garwal> accept parameters. I'm finding that I have to modify the garwal> source a lot in order to get it to compile. garwal> garwal> Does anyone have any suggestions that may help me in porting garwal> OpenSSL to this environment? Is there another SSL toolkit garwal> that is more ANSI C friendly? Uhmm, OpenSSL is supposed to be ANSI C (well, at least C89) friendly. It may be that we haven't done a good enough job and that we need to correct some things, but that would require that you help us figure it out by sending us *complete* build logs. As for other SSL toolkits, I can't say that I've much experience, so I can't really help you there. OBTW, what OpenSSL version did you use? ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44 \ SWEDEN \ Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
