On Tue Nov 26 22:30:34 2013, cosborn...@hotmail.com wrote: > I've noticed what appears to be a bug in the 586 assembly-optimized > AES_cbc_encrypt function of OpenSSL 1.0.1e, (compiled on Windows) > when encrypting data that is> 1 block in length, but not an > integral multiple of the block size.
Well the low level cbc routines behaviour when the input is not a multiple of the block size is undefined. The higher level EVP routines pad the input data to a multiple of the blocks size if block padding is not disabled. If block padding is disabled then attempting to encrypt data whose total length is not a multiple of the block size returns an error. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
