On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:34:53PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 23:29 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 09:56:24PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > 
> > The whole point of this signed timestamp is that the signature
> > doesn't expire and that you don't have to care about the wall
> > clock.
> 
> ... which is much more simply achieved by just not caring about the
> validity times of the certificate in the first place.

In case of a timestamp you can reduce the check to verify that the
timestamp was in the validity period of the certificate.


Kurt

_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to