>    I at least have a plan to add additional data, but probably not in
>    the current idea was probably not the way you would like to see it.

:-)  

>    My idea was to query at least various sources that we don't
>    attribute any entropy to, like getpid(), gettimeofday(),
>    clock_gettime(), the TSC, ...

>From my point of view – adding these doesn’t add a whole lot, but it doesn’t 
>hurt. IMHO – add away. ;-)

>    It might also use things like RDRAND / RDSEED which we don't trust.

Some don’t trust these, some think that they would add a good amount of 
entropy. I for one would certainly like to see the output of these mixed in. 
>From cryptography point of view, it cannot hurt, but may help a lot. Consider 
it as a lottery ticket you don’t have to pay for. ;-)
    
>    So I guess you want an interface that can both add things to the
>    "entropy" pool, and to the "additional data" pool?

That is correct. Especially because some of us have “real” nice/fancy hardware 
RNG (TRNG) available, and some like to mix in the output from RNGs on hardware 
tokens - maybe not as impressive as a “real” fancy TRNG, but as they say, every 
bit helps – in this case literally.

> It shouldn't be that hard, I'll try to come up with some proposal soon.
    
Thank you!!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

-- 
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to