Mathias Brossard wrote: > On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 19:59, Ben Laurie wrote: > >>Mathias Brossard wrote: >> >>>- Asymmetric: DSA, RSA, ECDSA >> >>Not my understanding. Anyway, DSS only. RSA can't be, and ECDSA we >>aren't doing. > > > It's a little disappointing that RSA is not part of the process (it is > much more common than DSA). Looking at the list of validated modules > http://csrc.nist.gov/cryptval/140-1/1401val.htm I see in the field > "FIPS-approved algorithms" the value "RSA (PKCS #1, vendor affirmed)". > Will you as a 'vendor' claim that OpenSSL is compliant with RSA PKCS#1 ?
Yes. > As a side note it seems that since 09/05/2003, Crypto++ is on the list > "FIPS 140-2 Level 1" with certificate #343. So I've heard. Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
