-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi!
Jorey Bump schrieb: [...] > > What distribution of Linux are you using? openssl is one of those > packages you might not want to replace if you want to stay in sync with > your distribution's security/bugfix updates. In many cases, you should > ignore the version of a package because the maintainers will backport > security fixes without updating the version string. This is very common > with openssl. This is our own Linux distribution and _I_ am the maintainer of it, so _I_ have to check for security fixes and updates! I do this for about ten years now, so I'm quite used to the procedure... ;-) This is the first time I saw a binary incompatibility problem between minor updates with the openssl libraries, so I figured I'd rather report it... - - andreas - -- Andreas Haumer | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *x Software + Systeme | http://www.xss.co.at/ Karmarschgasse 51/2/20 | Tel: +43-1-6060114-0 A-1100 Vienna, Austria | Fax: +43-1-6060114-71 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDS9eTxJmyeGcXPhERAm2UAJ99njDWOa+pJ1vPm9t2FhDFD8ToDACglsUS F0f2KTMdw2WbHSzv5IL5k/g= =6FkZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
