Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> Has this ever been (in recent history) an issue within a given > release branch? Ie. has 0.9.8(n+1) ever broken apps that were > running ok against 0.9.8n? 0.9.8x is of course not backwards > compatible with 0.9.7y, and 0.9.9 will not be backwards compatible > with 0.9.8 either. But that's why (reputable) distros allow these > branches to coexist and be upgraded independently. I suspect an application using PKCS12_create and passing a non-NULL name will segfault on 0.9.8h. (I confess I've not actually tried that---I've only tried with an application built against 0.9.8h.) However, I guess (presuming the problem really exists, and I didn't mess up somehow) that's more a bug than a binary incompatibility. 0.9.8g (IIRC) broke source compatibility in the sense that at least some C++ compilers don't accept some of the headers. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
