On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:26 PM, David Schwartz <dav...@webmaster.com> wrote: [...]
Whoops. I was writing my response while David's made it already across. His is shorter and saying exactly the same. ACKs are not important. There's message, there's stream and the security breach. The latter does not happen due to any tricks with the former. The only thing the attacker will 'gain' is temporal disability to communicate. temporal = as long as the attacker is active in any way. -- Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards, Ger Hobbelt -------------------------------------------------- web: http://www.hobbelt.com/ http://www.hebbut.net/ mail: g...@hobbelt.com mobile: +31-6-11 120 978 -------------------------------------------------- ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
