In message <3a1728b8c014426bb3e557832d275...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:14:38 +0000, "Salz, Rich" <rs...@akamai.com> said:
rsalz> rsalz> > It's not a huge step to support full blown ISO 8601 (which has a few more rsalz> > alternatives to specify time intervals *). I like the idea. rsalz> rsalz> No, it *is* a huge step. There's a reason why W3C XML schema language (XSD), not known for being lightweight, profiled the ISO standard. Sorry, I was unclear. What I meant was that it's not a huge step from the XSD to full blown ISO 8601. Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
