Hi Michael, On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Wojcik <michael.woj...@microfocus.com> wrote: >> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf >> Of Kim Gräsman >> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 04:14 >> >> Everything seems to work pretty well, but one thing is worrying -- the >> opensslconf.h header comes out different between the two builds. >> >> I'm assuming this only affects implementation details in OpenSSL and >> not the public API? I don't have to publish and maintain >> architecture-specific headers, do I? > > opensslconf.h is generated from the configuration settings and platform > characteristics, and applications must be compiled using the opensslconf.h > that corresponds to the build they link to (or one that's equivalent). > > Sometimes you can get away with using the wrong opensslconf.h, but this can > cause hard-to-find errors. One project I know of went for several years using > the wrong opensslconf.h, and it was only discovered when a different project > used some other OpenSSL features and got incorrect results on some platforms. > > So, in short: You do in fact have to publish and maintain one > architecture-specific header.
Thanks, I was afraid so. We're compiling for 6 different targets, so this will turn into an exciting problem :-) I'll try to think up a way forward with this. Any chance that OpenSSL 1.1 is different in this regard? Thank you, - Kim -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
