Awesome, I sit corrected in this case. :) In any case, though, it's generally best to plan to recompile. (Who says that TLS 1.4 will be able to be implemented in a binary compatible manner?) And even with this news, it is certainly a requirement that the original poster must plan to replace the dynamic library used by his application on the devices it is deployed on.
-Kyle H On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <openssl-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 2017, at 8:42 PM, Kyle Hamilton <aerow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > In other words, it is very unlikely that TLS 1.3 can be implemented > > in a binary-compatible manner. It is best if you plan to recompile > > your application against the version of the library that implements > > TLS 1.3. > > Unlikely or not, the OpenSSL 1.1.1 release will be binary compatible > with 1.1.0 and will support TLS 1.3. There will be new features, but > for most appliations, the software and protocol upgrade is transparent. > > > -- > Viktor. > > -- > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users >
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users