Harm,
We were not able to enable dual stack with l3 routers in Juno release. You may
need to wait for Kilo to see if that can be pushed in.
Xu Han
—
Xu Han Peng (xuhanp)
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Harm Weites <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> We're running Juno since a few weeks now, is it now possible to go dual
> stack with l3-routers or are there some pieces missing and should I wait
> for Kilo?
> -Harm
> On 08/19/2014 07:08 PM, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) wrote:
>>
>> Hi Harm:
>>
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately I haven’t had time to complete the changes yet. Even
>> if/when these changes are completed, it’s unlikely that this blueprint
>> will get approved for Juno, but I’ll see what I can do.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*Harm Weites [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:53 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack
>>
>>
>>
>> Thiago,
>>
>> My old setup was dual-stacked, simply using a flat linuxbridge. It's
>> just that I now realy would like to separate multiple tenants using L3
>> routers, which should be easy (dual stacked) to achieve once Dane's
>> work is completed.
>>
>> Did you find the time to commit those required changes for that yet Dane?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Harm
>>
>> op 16-08-14 23:33, Martinx - ジェームズ schreef:
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>>
>>
>> Just for the record, I'm using IceHouse in a Dual-Stacked
>> environment (with security groups working) but, Instance's IPv6
>> address are static (no upstream SLAAC, arrived in Juno-2, I think)
>> and the topology is `VLAN Provider Networks`, no Neutron L3
>> Router. Where each VLAN have v4/v6 addrs, same upstream router
>> (also dual-stacked - still no radvd enabled).
>>
>>
>>
>> Looking forward to start testing L3 + IPv6 in K...
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thiago
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16 August 2014 16:21, Harm Weites <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dane,
>>
>> Thanks, that looks promising. Once support for multiple v6
>> addresses on
>> gateway ports is added I'll be happy to give this a go. Should it work
>> just fine with an otherwise Icehouse based deployment?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Harm
>>
>> op 16-08-14 20:31, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef:
>>
>> > Hi Harm:
>> >
>> > Can you take a look at the following, which should address this:
>> >
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multiple-ipv6-prefixes
>> >
>> > There are some diffs out for review for this blueprint:
>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113339/
>> > but the change to support 1 V4 + multiple V6 addresses on a
>> gateway port hasn't been added yet. I should be adding this soon.
>> >
>> > There was a request for a Juno feature freeze exception for this
>> blueprint, but there's been no response, so this may not get
>> approved until K release.
>> >
>> > -Dane
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Harm Weites [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
>> > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM
>> > To: [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > Subject: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm wondering what the
>> current status of going dual stack is. Of course, given Neutron
>> got something like that on it's roadmap.
>> >
>> > The initial BP [2] aimed for Havana and Icehouse, and I'm
>> unaware of something similar to achieve a dual stack network. What
>> are the options, if any? To my knowledge it all comes down to
>> supporting multiple exterior interfaces (networks) on a l3-agent,
>> which is currently limited to just 1: either IP4 or IP6.
>> >
>> > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77471/
>> > [2]
>> >
>>
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/allow-multiple-subnets-on-gateway-port
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Harm
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
