+1, sounds great, thanks for the effort cheers, Jan
Adam Spiers <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 23. Juni 2015 um 12:28 Uhr: > [cross-posting to openstack-dev and pacemaker lists; please consider > trimming the recipients list if your reply is not relevant to both > communities] > > Hi all, > > https://github.com/madkiss/openstack-resource-agents/ is a nice > repository of Pacemaker High Availability resource agents (RAs) for > OpenStack, usage of which has been officially recommended in the > OpenStack High Availability guide. Here is one of several examples: > > > http://docs.openstack.org/high-availability-guide/content/_add_openstack_identity_resource_to_pacemaker.html > > Martin Loschwitz, who owns this repository, has since moved away from > OpenStack, and no longer maintains it. I recently proposed moving the > repository to StackForge, and he gave his consent and in fact said > that he had the same intention but hadn't got round to it: > > > https://github.com/madkiss/openstack-resource-agents/issues/22#issuecomment-113386505 > > You can see from that same github issue that several key members of > the OpenStack Pacemaker sub-community are all in favour. Therefore > I am volunteering to do the move to StackForge. > > Another possibility would be to move each RA to its corresponding > OpenStack project, although this makes a lot less sense to me, since > it would require the core members of every OpenStack project to care > enough about Pacemaker to agree to maintain an RA for it. > > This raises the question of maintainership. SUSE has a vested > interest in these resource agents, so we would be happy to help > maintain them. I believe Red Hat is also using these, so any > volunteers from there or indeed anywhere else to co-maintain would be > welcome. They are already fairly complete, and I don't expect there > will be a huge amount of change. > > I'm probably getting ahead of myself, but the other big question is > regarding CI. Currently there are no tests at all. Of course we > could add bashate, and maybe even some functional tests, but > ultimately some integration tests would be really nice. However for > now I propose we focus on the move and defer CI work till later. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks! > Adam > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
