Kirill, Here's the latest on the Nova freeze concept: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/068079.html
-- dims On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Kirill Zaitsev <[email protected]> wrote: > We had discussed this (see subj) interesting idea, during our latest meeting > in IRC > (http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2015/murano.2015-07-07-17.01.html) > The idea was borrowed from nova, who froze their specs shortly after L1 > release. The reasoning behind this is rather simple, as adding something, > that requires a spec during a 2d half of the cycle, seems like a not so good > idea. Knowing that there would be a spec freeze of some sort, would probably > 1) make contributors want to write their specs beforehan > 2) make reviewers review specs more often (although I’m not really sure if > there is a good way to encourage spec reviews) > > What do you think about such an idea? > Obviously introducing a spec-freeze for liberty (without proper prior > notice) is a bad thing to do. But sounds like a reasonable idea for M cycle. > Somewhere between M-1 and M-2, maybe? What do you think? > > -- > Kirill Zaitsev > Murano team > Software Engineer > Mirantis, Inc > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
