Thierry Carrez said on Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:56:37PM +0200: > Tag-every-commit: > (+) Conveys clearly that every commit is consumable > (-) Current tooling doesn't support this, we need to write something > (-) Zillions of tags will make tags ref space a bit unusable by humans > > Time to time tagging: > (+) Aligned with how we do releases everywhere else > (-) Makes some commits "special" > (-) Making a release still requires someone to care > > Missing anything ?
Without offering an opinion either way, I'm just wondering how tag-every-commit is superior to never tagging? The git SHAs already uniquely identify every commit; if you want only those on master, simply `git log master`. Alexis (lxsli) -- Nova developer, Hewlett-Packard Limited. Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 1HN. Registered Number: 00690597 England VAT number: GB 314 1496 79 __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
