On 11/10/2015 07:41 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10 2015, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
>> Julien, Victor,
>>
>> How about - oslo.cli = apiclient/*.py + cliutils.py - since we already
>> have a spec for a new library for apiclient
>
> I may be lacking context here, but we built a new complete client
> recently (python-gnocchiclient) without apiclient and cliutils at all.
> We just used cliff and keystoneauth1.
>
> So I really doubt we need these legacy libraries nowadays. Isn't the
> best option to just let them die and spend efforts moving clients away
> From them?
Yes, they should honestly just be cut loose in the client trees, and
clients should be encouraged to go the keystoneauth1 / cliff route in
the future.
280 lines of code across 11 clients isn't actually that much code, it's
1% of novaclient. It's not really worth building a new library for
especially because we don't actually want to encourage people to do this
any more.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
