On 06/18/2013 06:06 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 18 June 2013 17:57, Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 13:17 +1200, Robert Collins wrote: >>> So, I've been pretty happy with reviews from Chris Jones and Clint >>> Byrum - would like to propose them for the tripleo review team(s). >> >> FWIW, it's not clear what team you mean - the triple projects on >> stackforge are os-config-applier, os-refresh-config, diskimage-builder, >> tripleo-heat-elements and tripleo-image-elements. >> >> The os-config-applier-core team covers the first two and >> diskimage-builder-core covers the latter three. > > Right, this is a little messy; we didn't appreciate enough of the > structure of gerrit when setting it up. I think it would be nice to > collapse down to one, or maybe two teams. That said, Chris and Clint > are reviewing everywhere, and are not members of both teams, so I'm > proposing to ensure they are both in both teams.
I agree about collapsing. If we're modeling tripleo after oslo, then I think having a tripleo-core team that owns the various tripleo repos would make the most sense. Then, if there is a need for a particular repo to have an addition set of people, we can make a core team for it (hacking-core and pbr-core, for instance, both contain oslo-core and then a couple of additional people) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
