On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:45:29PM +0000, Alan Kavanagh wrote: > Will hopefully submit that really soon. Perhaps we can look at combining both > of them and discuss this in Hong Kong as I have looked over your BP and I can > see some benefit in combining them both.
Hi Alan, That sounds great - the objective of my BP was to try and make a QoS API extension that was flexible enough that everyone could make their own implementation. At this point, this is accomplished through storing key/value pairs that are linked back to a QoS object, via the policies attribute (which maps to the qos_policies table), that stores implementation specific behavior/configuration. There is also a wiki page, that has some useful links: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/QoS -- Sean M. Collins
pgpFaQTxkBTIG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
