On Oct 22, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Tim Simpson wrote: > > It's not intuitive to the User, if they are specifying a version alone. > > You don't boot a 'version' of something, with specifying what that some > > thing is. I would rather they only specified the datastore_type alone, and > > not have them specify a version at all. > > I agree for most users just selecting the datastore_type would be most > intutive. > > However, when they specify a version it's going to a be GUID which they could > only possibly know if they have recently enumerated all versions and thus > *know* the version is for the given type they want. In that case I don't > think most users would appreciate having to also pass the type- it would just > be redundant. So in that case why not make it optional?]
im ok w/ making either "optional" if the criteria for selecting the _other_ is not ambiguous.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
