Hey all! We're adding a little bit of code to pbr to make the auto-generated ChangeLog files a bit more useful. Currently, they are just the git changelog, which is kinda useless. So we wrote this:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52367/ which produces output like this: http://paste.openstack.org/show/49999 # on a tag and http://paste.openstack.org/show/50001 # not on a tag It underscores the need for commit subjects to communicate something, which is a good thing. With that there, it makes changes like: * Updated from global requirements and * Update my mailmap Kinda lame in the changelog. So we were thinking - what if we recognized one or more subject tags to skip things going into the ChangeLog file. My first thought was: NIT: # use this for tiny commits that are not really worth changelogging and AUTO: # use for commits generated by our machines, such as the global requirements sync or the Translations sync. What do people think? Should we bother? Are those good? Would something else be better? It's sort of an opt-in feature, so adding it SHOULDN'T bork too many people. Thoughts? Monty _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
