On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Thanks for writing this! > > On 02/28/2017 03:42 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > >> Greetings fellow ironic humanoids! >> >> As many have known, I've been largely attempting to drive Boot from >> Volume functionality in ironic over the past two years. Largely, in a >> slow incremental approach, which is in part due to how I perceived it >> to best fit into the existing priorities when the discussions started. >> >> During PTG there was quite the interest by multiple people to become >> involved and attempt to further Boot from Volume forward this cycle. I >> would like to move to having a weekly meeting with the focus of >> integrating this functionality into ironic, much like we did with the >> tighter neutron integration. >> > > +1 > > >> I have two reasons for proposing a new meeting: >> >> * Detailed technical status updates and planning/co-ordination would >> need to take place. This would functionally be noise to a large number >> of contributors in the ironic community. >> >> * Many of these details would need need to be worked out prior to the >> first part of the existing ironic meeting for the weekly status >> update. The update being a summary of the status of each sub team. >> >> With that having been said, I'm curious if we could re-use the >> ironic-neutron meeting time slot [0] for this effort. That meeting >> was cancelled just after the first of this year [1]. In it's place I >> think we should have a general purpose integration meeting, that could >> be used as a standing meeting, specifically reserved at this time for >> Boot from Volume work, but could be also by any integration effort >> that needs time to sync-up in advance of the existing meeting. >> > > I'm in favor of a generic meeting. I'm not sure it's worth taking the > whole 1 hour slot though. I think that the BFV one might only take half of > slot, where the second half maybe taken by another integration subteam. > > Speaking of which, I propose the networking subteam to start (continue?) > having their own meeting as well. There is a lot of stuff going on that is > hard to catch up with. > We stopped that meeting because it had turned into a status update. We just rolled it back up into the usual subteam updates. I'd like to leave it to the folks working on that to decide if they need a meeting to keep up with everything. // jim
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
