2017-03-13 12:23 GMT-07:00 Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com>: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Chris Friesen > <chris.frie...@windriver.com> wrote: >> >> On 03/10/2017 01:37 PM, John Griffith wrote: >> >>> Now that micro-versions are *the API versioning scheme to rule them all* >>> one >>> question I've not been able to find an answer for is what we're going to >>> promise >>> here for support and testing. My understanding thus far is that the >>> "community" >>> approach here is "nothing is ever deprecated, and everything is supported >>> forever". >> >> >> Nova has so far taken this approach, but there has been talk of bumping >> the minimum required microversion at every dev gathering. It hasn't >> happened yet, but if the support costs of maintaining the compat code >> becomes too high then it could happen. > > > Indeed. We discussed this at the PTG a bit[0], and plan to use ironic as an > experiment for this. It's an admin-only API, so the API users should be the > same (or in contact with) the folks deploying it, and so it shouldn't be as > surprising. We hope to get some feedback and find out if doing this is as > terrible as we keep saying.
That seems a nice plan. The effective scope of bumping minimum microversion could be small and it would be easier to get feedback from administrators by comparing normal API consumers. Thanks __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
