On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Chris Friesen <chris.frie...@windriver.com> wrote:
> On 05/05/2017 10:48 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > Would it be accurate to say, then, that from your perpsective the >> tendency of OpenStack to adopt new projects willy nilly contributes >> to the sense of features winning out over deployment, configuration >> and usability issues? >> > > Personally I don't care about the new projects...if I'm not using them I > can ignore them, and if I am using them then I'll pay attention to them. > > But within existing established projects there are some odd gaps. > > Like nova hasn't implemented cold-migration or resize (or live-migration) > of an instance with LVM local storage if you're using libvirt. > > Image properties get validated, but not flavor extra-specs or instance > metadata. > > Cinder theoretically supports LVM/iSCSI, but if you actually try to use it > for anything stressful it falls over. > Oh really? I'd love some detail on this. What falls over? > Some of the database pruning tools don't cover all the tables so the DB > gets bigger over time. > > I'm sure there are historical reasons for all of these, I'm just pointing > out some of the things that were surprising to me. > > Chris > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
