On 16 Jan 2014, at 13:06, Jesse Noller <jesse.nol...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>> Since it’s pretty easy to get lost among all the opinions I’d like to
>> clarify/ask a couple of things:
>>
>> Keeping all the clients physically separate/combining them in to a single
>> library. Two things here:
>> In case of combining them, what exact project are we considering? If this
>> list is limited to core projects like nova and keystone what policy could we
>> have for other projects to join this list? (Incubation, graduation,
>> something else?)
>> In terms of granularity and easiness of development I’m for keeping them
>> separate but have them use the same boilerplate code, basically we need a
>> OpenStack Rest Client Framework which is flexible enough to address all the
>> needs in an abstract domain agnostic manner. I would assume that combining
>> them would be an additional organizational burden that every stakeholder
>> would have to deal with.
>
> Keeping them separate is awesome for *us* but really, really, really sucks
> for users trying to use the system.
You may be right but not sure that adding another line into requirements.txt is
a huge loss of usability.
Renat Akhmerov
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
