> Yes this is one approach if keystone really wants to extend domains to work
> this way, but I think this is more complex than just using nested projects.
> Having domains contain domains containing projects is less intuitive than
> projects all the way down.
It's worth mentioning that at the meeting last Friday where all this was
discussed it was pointed out that currently there are very few functional
differences between projects and domains (user namespacing being the main one
right now), so aside from a philosophical exercise it doesn't seem like it
matters whether you extend domains or projects to be hierarchical. It
accomplishes the exact same thing.
Personally I favor projects being hierarchical, but maybe that's just because
they've been around longer, although domains might tie better into a story
around federated clouds, etc...
All the best,
- Gabriel
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
