On 08/12/2014 10:56 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hey > > (Terrible name for a policy, I know) > > From the version_cap saga here: > > https://review.openstack.org/110754 > > I think we need a better understanding of how to approach situations > like this. > > Here's my attempt at documenting what I think we're expecting the > procedure to be: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-retrospective-veto-revert-policy > > If it sounds reasonably sane, I can propose its addition to the > "Development policies" doc.
Looks reasonable to me. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
