On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:36:46 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 13:24 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > On 08/27/2014 03:35 PM, Ken Giusti wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I believe Juno-3 is our last chance to get this feature [1] included > > > into olso.messaging. > > > <SNIP!> > > > > > > Hi Ken, > > > > Thanks a lot for your hard work here. As I stated in my last comment on > > the driver's review, I think we should let this driver land and let > > future patches improve it where/when needed. > > > > I agreed on letting the driver land as-is based on the fact that there > > are patches already submitted ready to enable the gates for this driver. > > I feel bad that the driver has been in a pretty complete state for quite > a while but hasn't received a whole lot of reviews. There's a lot of > promise to this idea, so it would be ideal if we could unblock it. > > One thing I've been meaning to do this cycle is add concrete advice for > operators on the state of each driver. I think we'd be a lot more > comfortable merging this in Juno if we could somehow make it clear to > operators that it's experimental right now. My idea was: > > - Write up some notes which discusses the state of each driver e.g. > > - RabbitMQ - the default, used by the majority of OpenStack > deployments, perhaps list some of the known bugs, particularly > around HA. > > - Qpid - suitable for production, but used in a limited number of > deployments. Again, list known issues. Mention that it will > probably be removed with the amqp10 driver matures. > > - Proton/AMQP 1.0 - experimental, in active development, will > support multiple brokers and topologies, perhaps a pointer to a > wiki page with the current TODO list > > - ZeroMQ - unmaintained and deprecated, planned for removal in > Kilo
Sounds like a plan - I'll take on the Qpid and Proton notes. I've been (trying) to keep the status of the Proton stuff up to date on the blueprint page: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/amqp10-driver-implementation Is there a more appropriate home for these notes? Etherpad? > > - Propose this addition to the API docs and ask the operators list > for feedback > > - Propose a patch which adds a load-time deprecation warning to the > ZeroMQ driver > > - Include a load-time experimental warning in the proton driver Done! > > Thoughts on that? > > (I understand the ZeroMQ situation needs further discussion - I don't > think that's on-topic for the thread, I was just using it as example of > what kind of advice we'd be giving in these docs) > > Mark. > > - Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev