On 11/26/2014 10:22 AM, Przemyslaw Kaminski wrote:
We want to monitor Fuel master node while Zabbix is only on slave nodes
and not on master. The monitoring service is supposed to be installed on
Fuel master host (not inside a Docker container) and provide basic info
about free disk space, etc.
Why not use the same thing for monitoring the Fuel master host as we do
for the docker containers/cluster?
P.
On 11/26/2014 02:58 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 11/26/2014 08:18 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
So then in the end, there will be 3 monitoring systems to learn,
configure, and debug? Monasca for cloud users, zabbix for most of the
physical systems, and sensu or monit "to be small"?
Seems very complicated.
If not just monasca, why not the zabbix thats already being deployed?
Yes, I had the same thoughts... why not just use zabbix since it's
used already?
Best,
-jay
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
