The response on the review is overwhelmingly positive (or, strictly speaking, unanimously non-negative).
If anyone has an objection, could you please register it before 12:00 UTC on Monday, January 12? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145025/ thanks, brian ________________________________ From: David Stanek [dsta...@dstanek.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 4:43 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging It's also important to remember that IRC channels are typically not private and are likely already logged by dozens of people anyway. On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Christopher Aedo <ca...@mirantis.com<mailto:ca...@mirantis.com>> wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com<mailto:fla...@redhat.com>> wrote: > Fully agree... I don't see how enable logging should be a limitation > for freedom of thought. We've used it in Zaqar since day 0 and it's > bee of great help for all of us. > > The logging does not remove the need of meetings where decisions and > more relevant/important topics are discussed. Wanted to second this as well. I'm strongly in favor of logging - looking through backlogs of chats on other channels has been very helpful to me in the past, and it sure to help others in the future. I don't think there is danger of anyone pointing to a logged IRC conversation in this context as some statement of record. -Christopher _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- David blog: http://www.traceback.org twitter: http://twitter.com/dstanek www: http://dstanek.com
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
