On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:10:41 -0500 Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Thoughts on getting consistency across all 3 projects (and possibly > > others)? > > Yeah, I personally like the second option as well, but agree that > consistency is the key (pun intended) here. > > I would say let's make a decision on the standard to go with > (possibly via the API or SDK working groups?) and then move forward > with support for that option in all three clients (and continue to > support the old behaviour for 2 release cycles, with deprecation > markings as appropriate). +1 to making this available in a consistent way. We need need to support the old client behaviour for at least a couple of cycles (maybe a bit longer) and the burden of doing so is pretty low. I don't think however that we can drop the REST API behaviour that quickly. 2 cycles for API deprecation in the past has been considered an insufficent length of time because of app breakage Regards, Chris __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev