Certainly it was my intent when I created that agenda item to cover reviews that wouldn't otherwise reach a decision -- either two cores wedged, or something else that we can't resolve trivially in gerrit.
Now, I can see that people don't like reviews sitting for a long time, but that's probably too long a list to cover in an IRC meeting. I'm not opposed to trying, but we should set expectations that we're going to talk about only a few important reviews, not the dozens that are unloved. Michael On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Tony Breeds <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:13:50PM +0100, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > >> I was always considering stuck reviews as reviews where 2 or more cores were >> disagreeing between themselves so that it was needing a debate discussion >> during the meeting. > > I was under the same impression. > > Stuck reviews were for reviewws were there was strong disagreement (amongst > cores) > Other reviews can be discussed as part of "Open discussion" > > Yours Tony. > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Rackspace Australia __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
