Can you please elaborate on "granularity of policy support within Ironic."? Is 
there a blueprint/etherpad we can take a look?


Guang


-----Original Message-----
From: Devananda van der Veen [mailto:devananda....@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 10:25 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][keystone][ironic] Use only Keystone v3 
API in DevStack

We (the Ironic team) have talked a couple times about keystone /v3 support and 
about improving the granularity of policy support within Ironic. No one stepped 
up to work on these specifically, and they weren't prioritized during Liberty 
... but I think everyone agreed that we should get on with the keystone v3 
relatively soon.

If Ironic is the only integrated project that doesn't support v3 yet, then yea, 
we should get on that as soon as M opens.

-Devananda

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Short story/question:
> Is keystone /v3 support important to the ironic team? For Mitaka i guess?
>
> Long story:
> The previous discussion - guidance from keystone team on magnum
> (http://markmail.org/message/jchf2vj752jdzfet) motivated me to dig 
> into the experimental job we have in devstack for full keystone v3 api 
> and ended up with this review.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221300/
>
> So essentially that rips out v2 keystone pipeline *except* for ironic jobs.
> as ironic has some hard-coded dependencies to keystone /v2 api. I've 
> logged a bug here:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1494776
>
> Note that review above depends on Jamie's tempest patch which had some 
> hard coded /v2 dependency as well 
> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214987/)
>
> follow up question:
> Does anyone know of anything else that does not work with /v3?
>
> Thanks,
> Dims
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to