Sean, I’d recommend deploy-hosts (I assume this is the bootstrap renamed?)
I’d also add a duplicate API of “deploy” and mark deploy as deprecated and follow the standard deprecation policies. I’d recommend making the new OpenStack specific deploy command deploy-openstack Regards -steve From: "sean.k.moo...@intel.com" <sean.k.moo...@intel.com> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [openstack-dev] [poll][kolla] Name of baremetal role/group Hi I recently introduced a new baremetal role/group which is used as part of the kolla-host playbook. https://github.com/openstack/kolla/tree/master/ansible/roles/baremetal This baremetal role is used to install all the dependencies required to deploy kolla containers on a “baremetal” host. The host does not have to be baremetal it can be a vm but the term baremetal was originally chosen as unlike other rules in Kolla it installs and configures packages on the host os. Given that kolla also has baremetal as a service via ironic and baremetal provision of servers with bifrost the question I would like To ask is should we change the name of the current role to install the kolla dependencies to something else. I have created a strawpoll link for this here http://www.strawpoll.me/11175159 The options available in the strawpool are: · kolla-host · host · baremetal · pre-install If there are any other suggestions fell free to discuss them in this thread. I will check the poll Friday evening gmt and submit a patch for review if consensus is that it should be changed. Regards Sean.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
