Mark McLoughlin wrote: > I just noticed a few things when reviewing the Fedora packaging of > keystone: > > - There's no diablo release tarball on https://launchpad.net/keystone > like other projects
That's because Keystone was not a core project until the Essex cycle. Doesn't mean it can't have a diablo release tarball, though. > - The 2011.3 tag in git has version=1.0 in setup.py. Which versioning > scheme is keystone going to follow? Keystone is going to follow the common versioning, i.e. Essex will be finally named 2012.1. Previous milestones are going to be alphas of 2012.1, named essex-1 to essex-4. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
