On 07/12/2012 10:36 AM, Thomas, Duncan wrote: > We’ve got volumes in production, and while I’d be more comfortable with > option 2 for the reasons you list below, plus the fact that cinder is > fundamentally new code with totally new HA and reliability work needing > to be done (particularly for the API endpoint), it sounds like the > majority is strongly favouring option 1…
Actually, I believe Cinder is essentially a bit-for-bit copy of nova-volumes. John G, is that correct? It's this similarity that really makes option 1 feasible. If the codebases (and API) were radically different, removal like this would be much more difficult IMHO. Best, -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp