----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Still" <michael.st...@canonical.com>
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net, openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 5:12:22 AM
> Subject: [Openstack] [Nova] How common is user_data for instances?
> 
> Greetings.
> 
> I'm seeking information about how common user_data is for instances
> in
> nova. Specifically for large deployments (rackspace and HP, here's
> looking at you). What sort of costs would be associated with changing
> the data type of the user_data column in the nova database?
> 
> Bug 1035055 [1] requests that we allow user_data of more than 65,535
> bytes per instance. Note that this size is a base64 encoded version
> of
> the data, so that's only a bit under 50k of data. This is because the
> data is a sqlalchemy Text column.
> 
> We could convert to a LongText column, which allows 2^32 worth of
> data,
> but I want to understand the cost to operators of that change some
> more.
> Is user_data really common? Do you think people would start uploading
> much bigger user_data? Do you care?

Nova has configurable quotas on most things so if we do increase the size of 
the DB column we should probably guard it in a configurable manner with quotas 
as well.

My preference would actually be that we go the other way though and not have to 
store user_data in the database at all. That unfortunately may not be possible 
since some images obtain user_data via the metadata service which needs a way 
to look it up. Other methods of injecting metadata via disk injection, agents 
and/or config drive however might not need it to be store in the database right?

As a simpler solution:

Would setting a reasonable limit (hopefully smaller) and returning a HTTP 400 
bad request if incoming requests exceed that limit be good enough to resolve 
this ticket? That way we don't have to increase the DB column at all and end 
users would be notified up front that user_data is too large (not silently 
truncated). They way I see it user_data is really for bootstrapping 
instances... we probably don't need it to be large enough to write an entire 
application, etc.


> 
> Mikal
> 
> 1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1035055
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to