Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package net-snmp for openSUSE:Factory
checked in at Mon May 16 16:32:45 CEST 2011.



--------
--- net-snmp/net-snmp.changes   2011-04-13 19:57:20.000000000 +0200
+++ /mounts/work_src_done/STABLE/net-snmp/net-snmp.changes      2011-05-12 
16:47:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,5 @@
+Thu May 12 14:49:34 UTC 2011 - [email protected]
+
+- update upstream patches from branch V5-6-patches to 20110512
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

calling whatdependson for head-i586


Old:
----
  net-snmp-5.6.1-upstream-20110328.patch.bz2

New:
----
  net-snmp-5.6.1-upstream-20110512.patch.bz2

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ net-snmp.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.ffRLQv/_old  2011-05-16 16:26:46.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.ffRLQv/_new  2011-05-16 16:26:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 
 Name:           net-snmp
 Version:        5.6.1
-Release:        6
+Release:        8
 License:        BSD3c(or similar) ; MIT License (or similar)
 Group:          Productivity/Networking/Other
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
 Source7:        net-snmp.sysconfig
 Source8:        net-snmp-rpmlintrc
 Source9:        baselibs.conf
-Patch0:         net-snmp-5.6.1-upstream-20110328.patch.bz2
+Patch0:         net-snmp-5.6.1-upstream-20110512.patch.bz2
 # unused patch atm
 Patch1:         net-snmp-5.5.0-socket-path.patch
 Patch2:         net-snmp-5.5.0-testing-empty-arptable.patch

++++++ net-snmp-5.6.1-upstream-20110328.patch.bz2 -> 
net-snmp-5.6.1-upstream-20110512.patch.bz2 ++++++
Files net-snmp/net-snmp-5.6.1-upstream-20110328.patch.bz2 and 
/mounts/work_src_done/STABLE/net-snmp/net-snmp-5.6.1-upstream-20110512.patch.bz2
 differ


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Remember to have fun...

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to