Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package docbook-toys for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2011-12-20 14:29:59
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/docbook-toys (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.docbook-toys.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "docbook-toys", Maintainer is "[email protected]"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/docbook-toys/docbook-toys.changes        
2011-09-23 01:55:40.000000000 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.docbook-toys.new/docbook-toys.changes   
2011-12-20 14:30:02.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,5 @@
+Thu Dec  1 16:45:01 UTC 2011 - [email protected]
+
+- add automake as buildrequire to avoid implicit dependency
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ docbook-toys.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.WpXH1d/_old  2011-12-20 14:30:07.000000000 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.WpXH1d/_new  2011-12-20 14:30:07.000000000 +0100
@@ -15,17 +15,17 @@
 # Please submit bugfixes or comments via http://bugs.opensuse.org/
 #
 
-
-
 Name:           docbook-toys
-BuildRequires:  docbook-dsssl-stylesheets openjade
+BuildRequires:  automake
+BuildRequires:  docbook-dsssl-stylesheets
+BuildRequires:  openjade
 %define sysconfdir %{_sysconfdir}
-License:        GPL v2 or later
+License:        GPL-2.0+
 Group:          Productivity/Publishing/DocBook
 Provides:       docbook-tools
 Requires:       texlive-jadetex openjade docbook_3 docbook_4 iso_ent 
docbook-dsssl-stylesheets
 Version:        1.51.0
-Release:        415
+Release:        0
 Summary:        DocBook Tools
 Source:         
http://www.suse.de/~ke/docbook-toys/docbook-toys-%{version}.tar.bz2
 Source1:        %{name}-README.SuSE

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to