Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package servicelog for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2012-02-07 14:46:50
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/servicelog (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.servicelog.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "servicelog", Maintainer is "[email protected]"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/servicelog/servicelog.changes    2011-11-17 
16:03:24.000000000 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.servicelog.new/servicelog.changes       
2012-02-07 14:46:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,5 @@
+Mon Feb  6 21:50:33 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- add autoconf, libtool and automake to BuildRequires 
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ servicelog.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.WtqJTo/_old  2012-02-07 14:46:54.000000000 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.WtqJTo/_new  2012-02-07 14:46:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
-# spec file for package servicelog (Version 1.0.1)
+# spec file for package servicelog
 #
-# Copyright (c) 2010 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
+# Copyright (c) 2012 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
 #
 # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
 # remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@
 Version:        1.1.9
 Release:        1
 Summary:        Servicelog Tools
-BuildRequires:  sqlite3-devel libservicelog-devel librtas-devel
+BuildRequires:  librtas-devel libservicelog-devel sqlite3-devel
+BuildRequires:  autoconf automake libtool
 Group:          System/Management
 License:        GPL-2.0
 Url:            http://linux-diag.sourceforge.net/servicelog 

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to