Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package suitesparse for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2012-06-07 15:40:33
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/suitesparse (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.suitesparse.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "suitesparse", Maintainer is ""

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/suitesparse/suitesparse.changes  2012-03-16 
13:26:30.000000000 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.suitesparse.new/suitesparse.changes     
2012-06-07 15:40:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,23 @@
+Wed Jun  6 12:05:34 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- fix bnc#751746.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Mon Jun  4 13:45:07 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- Update to version 4.0.0. Major changes:
+  * added GPU support for CHOLMOD
+  * Renamed UFconfig to SuiteSparse_config
+- Fix licenses (some libraries are LGPL-2.1+, some are GPL-2.0+,
+  and one is both).
+- Change descriptions to upstream versions
+- Build csparse package
+- Clean up spec file
+  * Remove hard-coded library versions everywhere.  Each library
+    version only needs to be changed in two places, which are right
+    next to each other
+- Move README to -devel package and remove now-empty base package
+- Changed group to match lapack/blas group (which this package is
+  essentially an extension of)
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  SuiteSparse-3.7.0.tar.bz2

New:
----
  SuiteSparse-4.0.0.tar.gz

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ suitesparse.spec ++++++
++++ 697 lines (skipped)
++++ between /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/suitesparse/suitesparse.spec
++++ and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.suitesparse.new/suitesparse.spec

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to