Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package rcs for openSUSE:Factory checked in 
at 2012-07-24 15:36:20
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/rcs (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rcs.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "rcs", Maintainer is "[email protected]"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/rcs/rcs.changes  2011-10-21 16:35:39.000000000 
+0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rcs.new/rcs.changes     2012-07-24 
17:20:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,5 @@
+Tue Jul 17 19:10:42 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- Fix build with missing gets declaration (glibc 2.16)
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

New:
----
  rcs-stdio.in.patch

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ rcs.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.HCVnF1/_old  2012-07-24 17:20:36.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.HCVnF1/_new  2012-07-24 17:20:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
 # spec file for package rcs
 #
-# Copyright (c) 2011 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
+# Copyright (c) 2012 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
 #
 # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
 # remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed
@@ -15,19 +15,17 @@
 # Please submit bugfixes or comments via http://bugs.opensuse.org/
 #
 
-# norootforbuild
-
 
 Name:           rcs
-License:        GPL-2.0+
-Group:          Development/Tools/Version Control
-AutoReqProv:    on
 PreReq:         %install_info_prereq
 Version:        5.8
-Release:        1005
+Release:        0
 Url:            http://www.gnu.org/software/rcs/
 Summary:        Revision Control System
+License:        GPL-2.0+
+Group:          Development/Tools/Version Control
 Source:         ftp://ftp.cs.purdue.edu/pub/RCS/rcs-%version.tar.gz
+Patch1:         rcs-stdio.in.patch
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
 
 %description
@@ -39,6 +37,7 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup
+%patch1 -p1
 
 %build
 ac_cv_path_SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail \

++++++ rcs-stdio.in.patch ++++++
Index: rcs-5.8/lib/stdio.in.h
===================================================================
--- rcs-5.8.orig/lib/stdio.in.h
+++ rcs-5.8/lib/stdio.in.h
@@ -691,12 +691,14 @@ _GL_CXXALIAS_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s
 _GL_CXXALIAS_SYS (gets, char *, (char *s));
 #  undef gets
 # endif
+# if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS
 _GL_CXXALIASWARN (gets);
 /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin,
    so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning.  Assume it is
    always declared, since it is required by C89.  */
 _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
 #endif
+#endif
 
 
 #if @GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF@ || @GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF_POSIX@
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to