Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package rubygem-mocha for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2012-09-01 21:59:37
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/rubygem-mocha (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rubygem-mocha.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "rubygem-mocha", Maintainer is "[email protected]"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/rubygem-mocha/rubygem-mocha.changes      
2012-08-04 13:24:39.000000000 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rubygem-mocha.new/rubygem-mocha.changes 
2012-09-01 21:59:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,12 @@
+Mon Aug  6 14:19:50 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- updated to version 0.12.3
+  * Revert rename of undocumented internal module since it turns out 
+    Rails/ActiveSupport is relying on its existence.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Fri Aug  3 14:10:41 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- updated to version 0.12.2
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  mocha-0.12.1.gem

New:
----
  mocha-0.12.3.gem

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ rubygem-mocha.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.gUKiVt/_old  2012-09-01 21:59:41.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.gUKiVt/_new  2012-09-01 21:59:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -17,13 +17,14 @@
 
 
 Name:           rubygem-mocha
-Version:        0.12.1
+Version:        0.12.3
 Release:        0
 %define mod_name mocha
 %define mod_full_name %{mod_name}-%{version}
 
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
 BuildRequires:  ruby-macros >= 1
+BuildRequires:  rubygem(rdoc) > 3.10
 Url:            http://gofreerange.com/mocha/docs
 Source:         %{mod_full_name}.gem
 Summary:        Mocking and stubbing library

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to