Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package python-msgpack-python for 
openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2012-10-07 19:59:54
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/python-msgpack-python (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.python-msgpack-python.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "python-msgpack-python", Maintainer is ""

Changes:
--------
--- 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/python-msgpack-python/python-msgpack-python.changes  
    2012-09-14 12:35:52.000000000 +0200
+++ 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.python-msgpack-python.new/python-msgpack-python.changes
 2012-10-07 19:59:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,12 @@
+Fri Sep 21 19:23:50 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- Update to 0.2.2:
+  - Add use_single_float option to Packer. When it is true, packs
+    float object in single precision format.
+  - unpack() didn't restores gc state when it called with gc
+    disabled. unpack() doesn't control gc now instead of restoring
+    gc state collectly. User can control gc state when gc cause
+    performance issue.
+  - Unpacker's read_size option didn't used.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  msgpack-python-0.2.1.tar.bz2

New:
----
  msgpack-python-0.2.2.tar.bz2

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ python-msgpack-python.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.79EQP1/_old  2012-10-07 19:59:59.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.79EQP1/_new  2012-10-07 19:59:59.000000000 +0200
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 
 Name:           python-msgpack-python
-Version:        0.2.1
+Version:        0.2.2
 Release:        0
 Summary:        MessagePack (de)serializer
 License:        Apache-2.0

++++++ msgpack-python-0.2.1.tar.bz2 -> msgpack-python-0.2.2.tar.bz2 ++++++
++++ 6147 lines of diff (skipped)

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to